COVID-19 is having a serious impact on our community and around the world. We understand that there are uncertainties right now.
But we want to reassure you that Davis Schilken, PC is still up and running and we are dedicated to supporting our clients, employees, and community. Please call us if you need help at 303-670-9855, we are able to set up either video conference or conference calls to address and handle your legal needs.
Be well and stay safe!

1658 Cole Blvd., Building 6, Suite 200, Lakewood, CO 80401
7887 E. Belleview Ave, Suite 820, Denver, CO 80111
Call Us: (303) 670-9855
Email: info@dslawcolorado.com
Call Us: (303) 670-9855

1658 Cole Blvd.,Building 6, Suite 200
Lakewood, CO 80401
7887 E. Belleview Ave, Suite 820,
Denver, CO 80111

Select Page

July 20, 2017

The Delaware Chancery Court has now ruled on the continuing asset protection aspect of a charging order against assets in a 49% owned LLC. In that court case, a charging order had been obtained by a creditor who wanted to seize the assets inside of the LLC.

The charging order however (as is many times the case) granted the creditor rights to the LLC assets only at the time the manager (who is usually also the debtor or a related party) decides to distribute the LLC assets out of the LLC. In this matter, the LLC owned just the home that the debtor used as his residence and therefore never had any reason to make any distributions (and now, even more so, the debtor had an extra incentive to not make any distributions, ever!).

What happens though when the debtor member (who apparently was also an LLC manager) dies and the LLC agreement (a/k/a the “operating agreement”) had the provisions (which I frequently still see in these agreements) that (A) forced the termination/liquidation of the LLC in the event of a death of an LLC member and (B) in the absence of certain affirmative action being carried out very quickly after the death event, allows the creditor with the charging order to easily attach and seize the LLC assets. That is what in fact happened in this case and the creditor was able to attach the LLC assets at that point. This highlights the need for those who are relying on an LLC’s asset protective qualities to revisit the operating agreement to determine if it should be amended before a later event, such as a death, exposes the LLC assets, such as real estate, to a creditor’s reach.

By Edward D. Brown Esq., LLM. CPA

Cite: Delaware Acceptance Corp. v. Estate of Metzner, C.A. No. 8861-MA (May 22, 2017)

Check out our latest blog, “Isn’t There Already a Law That Leaves Everything To My Spouse and Kids?”