Ohio Chimes In that Trust Assets are Protected from Property Division in a Divorce, Even When the Divorcing Beneficiary, as the Sole Trustee, Can Make Distributions to Himself

September 27, 2017

The trial court in Ohio, and the appellate court, both agreed after some well-thought out analysis, that a beneficiary’s interest in a third-party trust set up by his father was not marital property, and therefore not subject to division in that beneficiary’s divorce. Continue reading

Once Again, If Charging Order Protection Closes the Door to Asset Access by the Creditors, the Courts May Open Another Door

September 20, 2017

The use of a limited liability company can provide what is known as charging order protection against creditors of individual members who have assets inside the LLC. Continue reading

Asset Protection Aspects of a Trust Pierced by IRS

September 13, 2017

The IRS has successfully pierced the asset protection aspects of a trust that was set up in New Jersey. In the past, I have published some accounts of other situations in which the federal government was able to treat assets in a trust as being property of its beneficiary because the trust agreement described a specific purpose for the trust. Continue reading

Will a Third-Party Trust Created for Your Family Be Safe from the IRS Tax Collector or from Other Federal Actions such as Restitution?

August 24, 2017
There have been a couple of recent cases that have concluded that there is no asset protection strategy to stop a formidable creditor, who has secured a federal judgment, from attaching a beneficiary’s interest in a trust created by, for example, Mom or Dad for their son or daughter as the beneficiary. Continue reading

The Double-Whammy’d Charging Order: Forget About Protecting the Assets in that LLC

August 21, 2017

Once again, the confidence one may have in relying on an LLC created in the United States as being the untouchable storehouse where assets can be safely tucked away, is misplaced. In the new ruling in the case of Peach REO, LLC v. Rice, Peach REO, LLC sought to attach the LLC interests that Malcolm Rice owned in various LLCs (in Tennessee, Mississippi and Delaware).   This attachment of the LLCs was through a charging order. Continue reading

Moving to Florida as the Last Resort Strategy to Avoid Creditor Actions—The Ultimate Asset Protection Maneuver?

August 9, 2017

Buying the ultra-expensive home in Florida has become known to protect unlimited amounts from creditors, even when the residence is purchased after the debtor is aware that a creditor claim exists or is looming. Continue reading

The Trust that Bars Both Creditors and State Income Taxes at the Same Time

August 2, 2017

The IRS recently issued Private Letter Ruling 201729009 where the IRS again blessed certain tax aspects of a trust (known as an “ING” trust, which stands for an “incomplete non-grantor” trust) that protects against both creditors and state income taxes. Continue reading

Having a Trust that is Both “Dated” and Irrevocable can be Hazardous to your Wealth.

July 26, 2017

Irrevocable trusts that were set up a few years ago (as well as many trusts that are still being set up today) which have provisions that are “etched in stone,” may later, due to changing laws or family circumstances, operate in a way that was completely unexpected. Continue reading

Cautionary Tale: Charging Order Upon Death of Debtor, Losing All the Limited Liability Company Asset Protection Benefits

July 20, 2017

The Delaware Chancery Court has now ruled on the continuing asset protection aspect of a charging order against assets in a 49% owned LLC. In that court case, a charging order had been obtained by a creditor who wanted to seize the assets inside of the LLC. Continue reading

JPMorgan Chase Bank v. McClure (2017 Colorado Supreme Court Ruling): Are Non-Colorado LLCs Now More Protective than Colorado LLCs for Colorado Residents?

July 12, 2017

In the recent Colorado Supreme Court decision (JPMorgan Chase Bank v. McClure, 2017 CO 22, 2017 WL 1321334 (Colo., April 10, 2017), the Court ruled that in order to enforce a charging order against an LLC, the creditor must bring the action to the jurisdiction where the targeted LLC was formed. Continue reading